From Wax to Plaster
Body Attitudes of Mannequins Part V
By Marsha Bentley Hale
Photo below: A 1925 Siegel & Stockman figure, Paris
Photos courtesy of Mannequin Museum Archive
Aug 8, 1999 / FW/ --- After World War I, countries were plunged into the chaotic realm of
picking up the pieces and getting back to the business of normal living.
It was also a time of major technological changes - cars, airplanes, modern art, architecture,
jazz, flappers, risque bathing suits and tans.
Concurrently, there was a major transition in the type of material used to sculpt mannequins, a
move from wax to plaster.
Plaster figures didn't melt in the show windows. They were much lighter in weight, thus easier
to handle. Plaster had very definite advantages.
But at the same time, with plaster, it was more difficult to achieve the detailed features and
anatomy that were possible with wax.
And because of such difficulties, a trend toward abstraction became apparent with the post-war
figures.
Abstraction pointed to the new emerging society of this post war period. Photographer/artist Man
Ray edited and abstracted the human figure in his work.
The film Metropolis features futured humanoids, while the film Potemkin dealt with the manipulation
of human actions.
Life was being abstracted carefully, and mannequins followed suit with their version of
abstracted articulation.
(Cora Scovil's classic bride of the late '30s exuded a cold strength, captured both in commanding
body language and facial expression.)
The crash of the stockmarket in 1929 forced the necessity of invention. Cut-out wood forms from
D.G. Williams and poster-art figures by Cora Scovil were reasonably priced pieces that quite
effectively substituted for mannequins. (Cora Scovil's company, called Vajah Inc. is longer
in existence.)
This trend of abstract mannequins continued on into the early '30s, though always with a
counterbalance of realism.
In fact, the conception or perception of realism fluctuated in definition from decade to decade.
But that's another story in itself.
|